HEPA vs ULPA vs Medium vs Pre Filter: Picking the Right One for Every Filter Stage
HEPA vs ULPA vs Medium vs Pre Filter: Picking the Right One for Every Filter Stage
When designing any air-filtration system β for a pharma plant, an operating theatre, or an office AHU β the first question is always: how many stages and what filter at each? This article compares the four most common filter types (Pre, Medium, HEPA, ULPA) head-to-head so you can decide quickly.
1. Four filter types β four different roles
Picture the four filter stages as a strategic defence formation:
- Pre Filter β the outer-perimeter guard, blocking every coarse threat (hair, fur, dust >10 Β΅m).
- Medium Filter β the inner-perimeter guard, handling moderate fine dust (0.5 Β΅m and above).
- HEPA Filter β the special-operations unit, capturing 0.3 Β΅m dust at >99.95% efficiency.
- ULPA Filter β the elite guard, controlling ultrafine 0.12 Β΅m particles at >99.999% efficiency.
Every stage is essential β no grade "replaces" another. Skip a stage (e.g. no Pre Filter) and the next stage clogs fast, multiplying replacement cost.
2. Master comparison table
| Criterion | Pre Filter | Medium Filter | HEPA Filter | ULPA Filter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard grade | G3 - G4 (EN 779) / Coarse 65-85% (ISO 16890) | F6 - F9 (EN 779) / ePM1 50-90% (ISO 16890) | H10 - H14 (EN 1822) | U15 - U17 (EN 1822) |
| Target particle size | >10 Β΅m | 0.5 - 1 Β΅m | 0.3 Β΅m @ MPPS | 0.12 Β΅m @ MPPS |
| Efficiency | 65 - 85% | 60 - 95% | 99.95 - 99.995% | β₯ 99.9995% |
| Initial pressure drop (Pa) | 30 - 80 | 80 - 200 | 200 - 250 | 250 - 600 |
| Typical replacement cycle | 1 - 3 months | 3 - 12 months | 1 - 5 years | 3 - 10 years |
| Reference price (VND) | 100k - few hundred k | 500k - few million | 2 - 15 million | 8 - 40 million |
| Position | AHU inlet | Mid-AHU | After Medium, at supply | Final stage (terminal/FFU) |
| Material | Polyester wool, plastic mesh | Pleated paper, synthetic cloth, bag | Glass fibre mini-pleat | Ultrafine glass fibre |
| Representative application | All AHUs, home purifiers | Hospital AHU, Grade C/D cleanrooms | Grade C, B cleanrooms, GMP, premium purifiers | Semiconductor, sterile pharma, Class 1 fabs |
3. Efficiency comparison @ particle size
For visualisation: at 0.3 Β΅m, the four types' capture efficiencies look like this:
- Pre Filter G4: ~5-15%
- Medium F8: ~70-85%
- HEPA H13: 99.95%
- HEPA H14: 99.995%
- ULPA U17: 99.9999%
At 0.12 Β΅m (very hard to capture):
- Pre Filter / Medium: essentially ineffective.
- HEPA H14: ~99.5-99.9%.
- ULPA U17: 99.9999% or better.
That is why you cannot "replace HEPA with stacked Medium filters" β the physics differs. Only HEPA and ULPA meet ISO 14644 and GMP-WHO standards.
4. The standard 3-stage cleanroom filter chain
Today's standard chains for pharma and electronics cleanrooms:
Configuration A β Grade D cleanroom (Class 100,000)
Pre G4 β Medium F8 β HEPA H13 (at terminal box or FFU)
For secondary-packaging zones, pharma warehouses, standard food processing.
Configuration B β Grade C cleanroom (Class 10,000)
Pre G4 β Medium F8 β HEPA H14 (terminal box or FFU)
For standard pharma compounding, electronics assembly, primary packaging.
Configuration C β Grade B cleanroom (Class 1,000)
Pre G4 β Medium F9 β HEPA H14 (AHU) β ULPA U15 (FFU)
For sterile support zones (background of Grade A), Grade B compounding.
Configuration D β Grade A cleanroom (Class 100, laminar)
Pre G4 β Medium F9 β HEPA H14 (AHU) β ULPA U15/U17 (LAF box / FFU)
For Grade A sterile compounding, vaccine vial filling, biologics production.
Configuration E β Electronics cleanroom Class 10 or higher
Pre G4 β Medium F9 β HEPA H14 (MAU) β ULPA U17 (full-coverage ceiling FFU)
For semiconductor fabs, hard-drive plants, optical-pickup production.
5. Selection for non-cleanroom environments
For other applications:
- Premium offices / hotels / airports: Pre G4 + Medium F7 (sufficient).
- General hospital (outpatient zones): Pre G4 + Medium F8 (recommended).
- Home air purifiers during PM2.5 season: Pre (washable plastic mesh) + HEPA H11/H12 + activated carbon.
- Paint shops, woodworking shops: Pre G4 + Pulse-jet Cartridge (replacing Medium due to heavy dust).
6. Common mistakes to avoid
- β Skipping the Pre Filter to save capex β result: HEPA clogs in 6 months, replacement costs 5-10Γ the Pre cost.
- β Buying "no-name" HEPAs without EN 1822 certification β no way to know the real efficiency, big risk for GMP audits.
- β Choosing ULPA for secondary packaging β wasteful; ULPA is not needed at Class 100,000.
- β No ΞP gauge β you have no idea when to replace, leading to both waste (early replacement) and risk (late replacement).
- β Installing the filter backwards β 30-50% bypass, efficiency collapses.
7. Quick decision table
When to use which configuration?
| Cleanroom requirement | Suggested configuration |
|---|---|
| Offices, hotels | Pre G4 + F7 |
| General clinic | Pre G4 + F8 |
| Standard OR | Pre G4 + F8 + HEPA H13 |
| Negative-pressure isolation room | Pre G4 + F9 + HEPA H14 |
| Pharma D | Pre G4 + F8 + HEPA H13 |
| Pharma C | Pre G4 + F8 + HEPA H14 |
| Pharma B | Pre G4 + F9 + HEPA H14 + ULPA U15 |
| Pharma A (LAF) | Pre G4 + F9 + HEPA H14 + ULPA U15/U17 |
| Electronics Class 1,000 | Pre G4 + F9 + HEPA H14 |
| Semiconductor fab Class 1-10 | Pre G4 + F9 + HEPA H14 + ULPA U17 |
Conclusion
There is no "best filter" β only the right filter chain for the specific requirement. Pre, Medium, HEPA, and ULPA complement each other; each has its own mission. Investing and maintaining them properly is the fastest path to GMP/ISO compliance while optimising 5-10 year operating cost.
About Green Filter
Green Filter supplies all four filter grades β Pre, Medium, HEPA and ULPA β together with design consulting for the right filter chain per cleanroom and AHU. We guarantee full certification (EN 779 / ISO 16890 / EN 1822) and hold stock in common sizes.
π Contact Green Filter for surveying and 3-stage filter chain consulting: [insert hotline / email / website]
See also: What is a HEPA Filter? Β· ULPA Filters U15/U16/U17 Β· How to choose HEPA/ULPA by cleanroom class.